ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2025
Co-designing prediction data visualizations for a digital binge eating intervention.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06349460 (A Micro-Randomized Trial to Optimize Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention for Binge Eating & Weight-related Behaviors), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Micro-Randomized Trial to Optimize Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention for Binge Eating & Weight-related Behaviors
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Young people's perceptions and recommendations for conversational generative artificial intelligence in youth mental health.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDigital interventions can leverage user data to predict their health behavior, which can improve users' ability to make behavioral changes. Presenting predictions (e.g. how much a user might improve on an outcome) can be nuanced considering their uncertainty. Incorporating predictions raises design-related questions, such as how to present prediction data in a concise and actionable manner. PURPOSE: We conducted co-design sessions with end-users of a digital binge-eating intervention to learn how users would engage with prediction data and inform how to present these data visually. We additionally sought to understand how prediction intervals would help users understand uncertainty in these predictions and how users would perceive their actual progress relative to their prediction.
methodsWe conducted interviews with 22 adults with recurrent binge eating and obesity. We showed prototypes of hypothetical prediction displays for 5 evidence-based behavior change strategies, with the predicted success of each strategy for reducing binge eating in the week ahead (e.g. selecting to work on self-image this week might lead to 4 fewer binges while mood might lead to 1 fewer). We used thematic analysis to analyze data and generate themes.
resultsUsers welcomed using prediction data, but wanted to maintain their autonomy and minimize negative feelings if they do not achieve their predictions. Although preferences varied, users generally preferred designs that were simple and helped them quickly compare prediction data across strategies.
conclusionsPredictions should be presented in efficient, organized layouts and with encouragement. Future studies should empirically validate findings in practice. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: The Clinical Trials Registration #: NCT06349460.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.