ReviewArthritis care & research2026
Longitudinal Relationship Between Pain and Depression in People With Inflammatory Arthritis: A Narrative Review.
Review in Arthritis care & research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As many patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) have chronic pain, understanding how to best assess and manage pain in IA is a priority. Comorbid depression is prevalent in adults with IA, affecting 15% to 39% of people. Although pain and depression are thought to be associated in IA, this concept is largely based on cross-sectional data. To better understand potential causality, longitudinal studies are required. This narrative review examines the relationship between pain and depression in patients with IA participating in observational longitudinal studies (spanning association strengths, direction of effect, and causal factors) and summarizes the literature on causal pathways in general populations alongside guideline recommendations/systematic reviews on assessing pain/depression in IA. Fourteen longitudinal studies in IA largely indicate an association between pain and depression, albeit with a small-to-modest effect size and a focus on pain intensity. This relationship appears to be bidirectional. Evidence on causal pathways is sparse in IA and limited in non-IA populations (with structural/function brain changes, altered sensory/pain thresholds, and sleep disturbance implicated) highlighting a need for further research. Although many patient-reported outcome measures exist to assess pain and depression in IA, evidence for their psychometric properties is often limited, and IA guidelines offer incomplete advice on pain/depression assessment. A simple approach of using a single-item pain intensity score (eg, a Numeric Rating Scale, which has strong clinimetric properties) in routine IA consultations, with screening for depression where relevant, appears appropriate. Further research is needed to understand how this could be achieved in different health care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.