Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40167813›Full record

SynthesisLasers in medical science2025

Systematic review of vascular lasers for the treatment of inflammatory active acne vulgaris.

Alireza Jafarzadeh, Sama Heidari, Reza Omid, Azadeh Goodarzi

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Facial laser complications (A Five Year Review).Lasers in medical science · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Current Trends and Future Insights on Rosacea Treatment: A Bibliometric Analysis.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alireza JafarzadehDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sama HeidariDepartment of Dermatology, Razi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Reza OmidDepartment of Dermatology, Razi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Azadeh GoodarziDepartment of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. azadeh_goodarzi1984@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acne vulgaris is a prevalent skin disorder with significant emotional and psychological impacts. Conventional treatments often have limitations, prompting exploration into alternative therapies like vascular lasers and light treatments. This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of vascular lasers (IPL, PDL, Nd:YAG) on inflammatory acne lesions associated with acne vulgaris. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Studies from 2010 to 2024 were searched in databases (Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase) using preset terms. Inclusion criteria encompassed English language studies on vascular lasers for inflammatory acne lesions in comparative and randomized controlled trials. Data extraction included study characteristics, patient data, laser parameters, and treatment outcomes. Quality assessment utilized the Cochrane ROB 2 tool. Out of 904 initially retrieved studies, 32 studies involving 1,520 patients met the inclusion criteria. The studies focused on 18 Intense Pulsed Light (IPL), 9 Pulsed Dye Laser (PDL), and 10 Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) lasers, with 5 studies comparing two modalities. IPL demonstrated acne vulgaris lesion reduction rates ranging from 42.40% to 61.56%, while PDL achieved reductions of up to 82.5%. Combined therapies, such as PDL/Nd:YAG, resulted in reductions as high as 83.5%. Fractional CO₂ lasers showed acne vulgaris lesion improvement rates of 87.94% ± 14.31, with sustained results at follow-up. Red light-PDT achieved an 85.50% ± 5.39 reduction, outperforming IPL-PDT (75.55% ± 8.09). In comparative studies, Nd:YAG lasers demonstrated slightly superior outcomes over IPL. Adverse effects, including erythema and pain, were generally mild, with severe side effects being rare. Vascular lasers, including IPL, PDL, and Nd:YAG, demonstrate significant efficacy and safety in treating inflammatory active acne vulgaris, with combination therapies often showing superior outcomes. Fractional CO₂ lasers and red light-PDT further expand treatment options. Adverse effects, such as erythema and pain, are generally mild and transient. However, variability in study protocols highlights the need for standardized treatment guidelines and further well-designed trials to optimize protocols and ensure consistent, long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisLasers, DyeLasers, Solid-StateLow-Level Light TherapyHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAcneAcne VulgarisIntense Pulsed LightIPLLaserLaser TherapyNd:YAG LaserNeodymium Yttrium Aluminum Garnet LaserPDLPulsed Dye LaserReviewSystematic ReviewVascular Laser

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.