Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40168062›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Modularity of the segmentation clock and morphogenesis.

James E Hammond, Ruth E Baker, Berta Verd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evolvability in vertebrate segmentation.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James E HammondBiology Department, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9603-3410
Ruth E BakerMathematical Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6304-9333
Berta VerdBiology Department, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9835-009X

Funding

European Research Council 101163722 StG CountsJohn Fell Fund, University of Oxford 0009780Natural Environment Research Council Environmental Research DTP grant NE/S007474/1Royal Society RGS\R1\211324Simons Foundation MP-SIP-00001828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vertebrates have evolved great diversity in the number of segments dividing the trunk body, however, the developmental origin of the evolvability of this trait is poorly understood. The number of segments is thought to be determined in embryogenesis as a product of morphogenesis of the pre-somitic mesoderm (PSM) and the periodicity of a molecular oscillator active within the PSM known as the segmentation clock. Here, we explore whether the clock and PSM morphogenesis exhibit developmental modularity, as independent evolution of these two processes may explain the high evolvability of segment number. Using a computational model of the clock and PSM parameterised for zebrafish, we find that the clock is broadly robust to variation in morphogenetic processes such as cell ingression, motility, compaction, and cell division. We show that this robustness is in part determined by the length of the PSM and the strength of phase coupling in the clock. As previous studies report no changes to morphogenesis upon perturbing the clock, we suggest that the clock and morphogenesis of the PSM exhibit developmental modularity.

Indexed as

Biological ClocksMesodermMorphogenesisZebrafishAnimalsComputer SimulationEmbryonic DevelopmentModels, BiologicalSomitesagent-based modelsevolutionevolvabilitymorphogenesisphysics of living systemspre-somitic mesodermsomitogenesiszebrafish

Identifiers

PMID40168062
PMCPMC11961122

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.