ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Volumetric Measures of Capillary Nonperfusion on Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Detect Early Ischemia in Diabetes Without Retinopathy.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macular, Peripapillary, and Midperipheral Nonperfusion in Diabetic Subjects: A Wide-Field OCTA Quantification.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Microvascular Volume Loss Exceeds Nerve Fiber Layer but Not Neuroretinal Rim Tissue Loss During Progression of Nonhuman Primate Experimental Glaucoma.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Macular Deep Capillary Plexus Ischemia as a Biomarker for Identifying Referable Diabetic Retinopathy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Understanding How Low Luminance Visual Deficit Progresses With Advancing Diabetic Macular Ischemia and Diabetic Retinopathy.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- The Importance of Matching Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Metrics to Diabetic Retinopathy Severity for Detecting Progression.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare volumetric 3-dimensional (3D) against standard 2-dimensional (2D) measurements of ischemia for distinguishing early stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR) using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods: This cross-sectional study considered 82 eyes of 82 patients (aged 51.0 ± 11.9 years) including 27 healthy controls, 31 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) without DR, and 24 patients with mild nonproliferative DR (NPDR). Using OCTA, we obtained 2D scans and 3D volumes of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP), middle capillary plexus (MCP), and deep capillary plexus (DCP). We calculated geometric perfusion deficits (GPDs), which define ischemic regions as those located farther than a specified threshold distance from the nearest blood vessel. For the GPD parameter, we compared the performance of a 20 µm versus 30 µm cutoff. Results: On 2D scans, eyes with mild NPDR had significantly higher GPDs in all 3 retinal capillary layers, indicating worse ischemia, compared with both healthy controls and patients with DM without DR, using either threshold (20 µm or 30 µm) to define GPD (all P < 0.05). DM without DR showed no significant difference from healthy eyes in 2D images. Interestingly, however, using 3D volumes, DM without DR eyes had significantly greater DCP GPDs than healthy eyes using a GPD threshold of 20 µm (P = 0.012), but not with 30 µm (P = 0.057). Conclusions: Using a stringent threshold (20 µm), volumetric OCTA imaging detects significant DCP perfusion defects in diabetic eyes even before DR onset, whereas traditional 2D OCTA does not. Volumetric scans may therefore be more sensitive to early ischemia in diabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.