Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40168398›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Venous and arterial thrombosis in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Anouk van Lent, Rebeca Puscasu, Karin A H Kaasjager, Saskia Haitjema, Britt B M Suelmann, Marianne C Verhaar, Meriem Khairoun, Gurbey Ocak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Anticoagulants in hematologic malignancies: what is the data?Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anouk van LentDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Rebeca PuscasuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Karin A H KaasjagerDepartment of Internal Medicine and Dermatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Saskia HaitjemaCentral Diagnostic Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Britt B M SuelmannDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marianne C VerhaarDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3276-6428
Meriem KhairounDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gurbey OcakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4288-7685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPi) have been associated with a prothrombotic and pro-atherogenic tendency which could lead to an increased risk of thrombosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of venous and arterial thrombosis (myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke) in patients who used ICPi as compared with the general population. Furthermore, we investigated the association between the occurrence of venous or arterial thrombosis and mortality.

methodsPatients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors ICPi between January 1, 2013, and May 31, 2020, at the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, were included in this study. Indirect standardization was used to compare the incidence rates of venous and arterial thrombosis in patients who used ICPi to the age- and sex weighted incidence rates in the general population. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to calculate Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs to investigate the association between the occurrence of a venous or arterial event after start of an ICPi and mortality.

resultsThe age- and sex weighted incidence rates in 663 patients who used ICPi as compared to the general population was 22.7-fold (95% CI 16.6-31.0) increased for venous thrombosis, 3.0-fold (95% CI 1.2-7.1) increased for myocardial infarction, and 3.2-fold (95% CI 1.6-5.7) increased for ischemic stroke. After adjustment, the all-cause mortality risk was 2.3-fold (95% CI 1.5-3.5) increased for patients who were diagnosed with venous thrombosis during follow-up and 2.2-fold (95% CI 1.1-4.1) increased for patients who were diagnosed with arterial thrombosis during follow-up as compared with patients without venous or arterial thrombosis during follow-up.

conclusionPatients receiving ICPi have elevated risks of venous thrombosis and arterial thrombosis. Occurrence of venous thrombosis or arterial thrombosis during treatment with ICPi is associated with an increased mortality risk.

Indexed as

Immune Checkpoint InhibitorsMyocardial InfarctionThrombosisVenous ThrombosisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansIncidenceIschemic StrokeMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40168398
PMCPMC11960909

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.