Trial reportGut and liver2025
Automated Whole-Liver Fat Quantification with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Derived Proton Density Fat Fraction Map: A Prospective Study in Taiwan.
Trial report in Gut and liver, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04463667 (Impact of Exercise Intervention for Patients With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Exercise Intervention for Patients With Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation methods of hepatic steatosis: From conventional techniques to emerging biomarkers.World journal of hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a proton density fat fraction (PDFF) sequence is the most accurate, noninvasive method for assessing hepatic steatosis. However, manual measurement on the PDFF map is time-consuming. This study aimed to validate automated whole-liver fat quantification for assessing hepatic steatosis with MRI-PDFF. Methods: In this prospective study, 80 patients were enrolled from August 2020 to January 2023. Baseline MRI-PDFF and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) data were collected. The analysis of MRI-PDFF included values from automated whole-liver segmentation (autoPDFF) and the average value from measurements taken from eight segments (avePDFF). Twenty patients with ≥10% autoPDFF values who received 24 weeks of exercise training were also collected for the chronologic evaluation. The correlation and concordance coefficients (r and ρ) among the values and differences were calculated. Results: There were strong correlations between autoPDFF versus avePDFF, autoPDFF versus MRS, and avePDFF versus MRS (r=0.963, r=0.955, and r=0.977, all p<0.001). The autoPDFF values were also highly concordant with the avePDFF and MRS values (ρ=0.941 and ρ=0.942). The autoPDFF, avePDFF, and MRS values consistently decreased after 24 weeks of exercise. The change in autoPDFF was also highly correlated with the changes in avePDFF and MRS (r=0.961 and r=0.870, all p<0.001). Conclusions: Automated whole-liver fat quantification might be feasible for clinical trials and practice, yielding values with high correlations and concordance with the time-consuming manual measurements from the PDFF map and the values from the highly complex processing of MRS (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04463667).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.