ArticleHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2025
Sex Differences in Ambulatory Central Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Hemodialysis Patients.
Article in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten tips to control blood pressure in haemodialysis patients.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Cf-PWV but not cr-PWV or cd-PWV is associated with cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSex differences have a significant role on epidemiology of cardiovascular complications in chronic kidney disease. Among hemodialysis patients, central blood pressure (BP) levels and increased arterial stiffness parameters are independent predictors of cardiovascular and all-cause- mortality.
aimTo examine the potential differences in ambulatory central BP and arterial stiffness parameters between male and female hemodialysis patients.
methodsA total of 129 male and 91 female hemodialysis patients were included in this analysis. All participants underwent 48-h ambulatory BP monitoring with Mobil-O-Graph-NG; indices of central hemodynamics (SBP, DBP and pulse pressure), wave reflection (augmentation pressure (AP) and augmentation index (AIx)) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) were estimated.
resultsAge, dialysis vintage and history of major comorbidities did not differ between men and women. Male patients had higher 48-h cSBP (124.7±15.7 vs. 119.8±16.7 mmHg, p=0.027) and 48-h DBP (83.7±12.2 vs. 77.5±11.9 mmHg, p<0.001) compared to female patients; relevant differences were also evident during the 44-h (excluding hemodialysis), 1st 24-h and 2nd 24-h periods and the corresponding daytime and nighttime periods of the recording. Central pulse pressure did not differ between groups. Regarding wave reflection parameters, AP, AIx, and AIx(75) were significantly lower in males versus females during the 48-h (AIx, 25.6±8.2 vs. 32.3±8.6 mmHg, p<0.001), 44-h, 1st and 2nd 24-h and also during respective daytime and nighttime periods. The two groups displayed similar PWV during all studied intervals (48-h PWV, 9.6±1.9 vs 9.7±2.1 m/s, p=0.612).
conclusionsMale hemodialysis patients present with higher levels of ambulatory central BP but significantly lower levels of AP, AIx and AIx(75) than females. PWV does not differ between sexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40169519What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.