ArticleScientific reports2025
Coactivation patterns reveal the abnormality of dynamic state transitions between different psychiatric disorders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Behavior Differentially Shapes Spontaneous Cortical Network Dynamics Across Frequencies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Altered Brain Network Dynamics in Schizophrenia Patients With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Resting-State fMRI Study Using Co-Activation Pattern Analysis.Human brain mapping · 2025Article
- Modulation of functional network co-activation pattern dynamics following ketamine treatment in major depression.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is growing interest in utilizing dynamic methods to investigate psychiatric disorders, particularly the transient dynamic approaches. However, current research predominantly focuses on dynamic abnormalities within a single psychiatric disorder compared to healthy controls, without considering the shared and specific features across different psychiatric conditions. The dynamic abnormality across psychiatric disorders remains unclear. In this study, we employed Co-activation Pattern (CAP) method to investigate the transient configurations of brain activity across different psychiatric conditions, including schizophrenia (SZ, n = 37); bipolar I disorder (BD, n = 40); attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD, n = 37), and healthy controls (HC, n = 110). By conducting k-means clustering analysis, we identified 10 transient activation patterns. Our findings reveal that the specificity of psychiatric disorders is reflected in the transition probabilities between states, with distinct state transition patterns observed across different disorders. Notably, abnormal state transitions are concentrated in the core states (State 1 and State 2), highlighting the common dynamic abnormalities across psychiatric conditions. These core states involve the activation of the attention network and the sensorimotor network and show significant associations with the functional gradient. Furthermore, we found that abnormalities in state transitions are associated with cognitive behavior. Overall, this work provides a dynamic network perspective for understanding the shared and specific characteristic of psychiatric disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.