ArticleScientific reports2025
Advanced design of 3D knitted padding for wearable cushioning in knee protector.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wearable cushioned products protect the body during sporting activities or work-related activities. Cushioning paddings made of elastomeric materials are used to absorb impact forces. The paddings are usually inelastic, which could be challenging to accommodate the movement of knee joints and lead to displacement. In this study, a new knitted composite which consists of soft surface layers, a shock absorption middle layer made of monofilament and silicone inlays and additional elastic inlays in the surface layer to accommodate the body contours is developed. The three-layer structure is knitted as 3D knee paddings in a single process. The air permeability, mechanical properties, and subjective wear comfort of the knitted paddings and their impact on muscle activity are evaluated and compared with those of commercially available elastomeric knee paddings. The results show that the knitted padding with a silicone inlay can better absorb impact forces than that without the inlay showing a 14% increment. The 3D knitted padding is perceived to be more soft, elastic and bendable, with a better fit and wear comfort, with more slip resistance than the elastomeric padding with a similar thickness. The outcomes can act as a good reference for the development of textile cushioning materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.