Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40169746›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Construction of reliable QSPR models for predicting the impact sensitivity of nitroenergetic compounds using correlation weights of the fragments of molecular structures.

Shahram Lotfi, Shahin Ahmadi, Alla P Toropova, Andrey A Toropov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shahram LotfiDepartment of Chemistry, Payame Noor University (PNU), 19395-4697, Tehran, Iran. Sh.lotfi@pnu.ac.ir.
Shahin AhmadiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. S.ahmadi@iautmu.ac.ir.
Alla P ToropovaEnvironmental Health Sciences Department, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, Milano, Italy.
Andrey A ToropovEnvironmental Health Sciences Department, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via Mario Negri 2, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impact sensitivity is a critical property of energetic molecules, indicating their tendency to react when subjected to mechanical stimuli such as impact. Nitro compounds are widely used as explosives across industrial, military, and civilian applications, making their safe handling a significant concern for engineers and scientists working with these materials. Predicting whether a molecule has the potential to pose safety risks is therefore of great importance. This study aimed to develop a QSPR model for predicting the impact sensitivity of 404 nitro compounds using the Monte Carlo algorithm implemented in CORAL-2023 software. The Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System (SMILES) was employed to represent the molecular structures, while correlation weight descriptors were computed. Four target functions (TF0, TF1, TF2, and TF3) were used to generate robust models. The first model applied Monte Carlo optimization without the inclusion of IIC (information index of correlation) or CII (correlation index of information); the second incorporated IIC; the third incorporated CII; and the fourth applied both IIC and CII. Comparative statistical analyses indicated that the model integrating both IIC and CII demonstrated superior predictive performance, with the best results observed in split 2 (R

Indexed as

Impact sensitivityMonte Carlo approachNitro compoundsQSPRSMILES

Identifiers

PMID40169746
PMCPMC11961700

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.