ArticlePrenatal diagnosis2025
Observed/Expected Lung-To-Head Ratio and Total Lung Volumes That Identify Fetuses With Severe Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia in a North American Fetal Center.
Article in Prenatal diagnosis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated fetal magnetic resonance imaging lung segmentation for rapid lung volume estimation across diverse pulmonary hypoplasia phenotypes.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: are improvements in ECMO & survival sustainable over time?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo define the ultrasound observed/expected lung-to-head ratio (O/E LHR) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) observed/expected total lung volume (O/E TLV) cut-offs associated with survival and lack of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) utilization to determine the most severe cohort that may benefit from fetal intervention.
methodsRetrospective review of patients with a prenatal diagnosis of isolated left or right congenital diaphragmatic hernia (L CDH, R CDH) seen and delivered at our level III fetal center from January 2013-July 2023. Data were extracted from our clinical outcome database. Characteristics of survivors and non-survivors were compared for both the L CDH and R CDH groups. For both O/E LHR and O/E TLV, the Youden criteria were then used to determine a good sensitivity and specificity for predicting survival and ECMO utilization for L and R CDH, respectively, in Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
results340 patients were included in the study, including 283 (83.2%) with L CDH and 57 (16.8%) with R CDH. The median [interquartile range, IQR] O/E LHR for L and R CDH was 37.9 [28.7-47.3] and 49.0 [40.0-64.5], respectively. The median O/E TLV for L and R CDH was 36.0 [28.0-48.0] and 25.3 [23.6-29.8], respectively. For survival, an O/E LHR of 28.1% and O/E TLV of 34.0% and an O/E LHR of 46.8% and O/E TLV of 17.6% were the best cut-offs for L and R CDH, respectively. For ECMO utilization, an O/E LHR of 32.8% and O/E TLV of 35.3% and an O/E LHR of 47.0% and O/E TLV of 22.0% were the best cut-offs for L and R CDH, respectively.
conclusionWe report the best ultrasound O/E LHR and MRI TLV cut-offs associated with survival and lack of ECMO utilization in our cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.