ArticleBMC cancer2025
Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous thermal ablation for abdominal wall metastases: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous thermal ablation for abdominal wall metastases. MATERIALS &
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with abdominal wall metastatic nodules who underwent ultrasound-guided microwave ablation (MWA) from August 2018 to September 2024. Tumor volume (V), volume reduction rate (VRR), pain scores, and University of Washington Quality of Life (Uw-QOL) scores were measured at one, three, and six months postoperative.
resultsA total of twelve patients were included in the study (8 males and 4 females), with one male patient excluded due to incomplete follow-up data. The median patient age was 51.5 years (range: 37-75). All patients were successfully treated, with no local recurrence noted during follow-up. Tumor volume reduction rates were 45.4%, 76.9%, and 96% at one, three, and six months, respectively. By the end of the follow-up period, the average pain scores decreased significantly from 7.09 ± 0.70 to 2.18 ± 1.16 (p < 0.001). The quality of life of patients was significantly improved, and the Uw-Qol of score increased from 1148.63 ± 94.07 to 1269.54 ± 118.25 (p < 0.05). No patient appeared serious complications. The clinical symptoms and quality of life of all patients were significantly improved.
conclusionUltrasound-guided percutaneous thermal ablation is a safe and effective minimally invasive method for the treatment of metastatic nodules of abdominal wall, presenting a viable option for patients who are unsuitable for or unwilling to undergo surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.