ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Social media as a source of information for patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a chronic, disabling condition without a definitive cure, and current management strategies prioritize symptom relief and slowing disease progression rather than addressing the underlying cause. Therefore, KOA patients turn to social media (SM) in the hope of finding a solution or a treatment to relieve their pain. The main goal of this study was to explore the prevalence of information sought by KOA patients on SM and to determine factors associated with its use.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included adult patients followed in our rheumatology department for KOA according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria for > 3 months. All patients underwent a standardized questionnaire-based interview covering their sociodemographic and clinical data, including age, level of education, body mass index, disease duration, and the presence of comorbidities. Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). We used the Lequesne index for KOA to assess functional impairment, and the Kellgren and Lawrence classification to assess the severity of KOA. We utilized the Trust in Physician Scale (TPS) to measure patients' trust in their physicians. In contrast, the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ)-Specific Concerns subscale assessed patients' concerns about prescribed medication. Psychosocial risk factors were assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7), and the Patient Health Questionnaire for depression (PHQ-9).
resultsA total of 178 patients were included, with an average age of 58 ± 9,915 years and a female predominance (88,2%). The average progression period of KOA was around 3 years [1; 8,5] and the median pain score on the VAS was 4,79 ± 2,214. A third of KOA patients turned to SM for health information, mainly YouTube. While 17% trusted the content, a comparable 10% shared it with their doctors. The main factors associated with SM use were younger age, higher level of education, and higher pain catastrophizing.
conclusionThese findings highlight the significant potential of SM platforms for KOA patients, whether it's enhancing their education and awareness, fostering peer support and community connections, or enabling better communication and remote monitoring with healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.