ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2025
Digital Phenotyping Measurement of Smartphone Social Behavior is Associated with Illness Progression Risk Scores in Young People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mobile Technology for Real-Life Assessment of Positive and Negative Symptoms as well as Stress Among Individuals With Early Psychosis: A Scoping Review.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- A multilevel meta-analysis of passive smartphone sensing of adolescent mental health.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Subjective Perceptions of Digital Phenotyping Measures of Negative Symptoms Among Individuals At Clinical High Risk for Psychosis and Their Relatives.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundYoung people at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-p) commonly experience social impairment, which contributes to functional decline and predicts transition to psychotic illness. Although the use of smart phone technology and social media platforms for social interaction is widespread among today's youth, it is unclear whether aberrant digital social interactions contribute to risk for conversion and functional impairment in CHR-p. The current study sought to characterize the nature of social smartphone and social media use in a CHR-p sample and determine its association with clinical symptoms and risk for conversion to psychosis. STUDY
designCHR-p (n = 132) and HC (n = 61) participants completed clinical interviews and 6 days of digital phenotyping that monitored total smartphone use, ratio of outgoing to incoming text messages and phone calls, social media use, and ecological momentary assessment surveys focused on in-person and electronic social interactions. Study Results: CHR-p did not differ from HC in total smartphone use for social communication or active social media use. However, CHR-p participants reported significantly less daily passive social media use compared to HC peers, and decreased text message reciprocity predicted 1- and 2-year conversion risk.
conclusionsResults demonstrate a nuanced digital social landscape with divergent relationships from in-person social behavior and suggest online socialization has implications for high-precision identification and intervention strategies among the CHR-p population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.