ArticlePsychophysiology2025
Genetic and Environmental Influences on Fear Learning and Generalization.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how excessive fear responses develop and persist is critical. Research using laboratory models of fear learning offers valuable insights on etiology. In this study, the influence of genetic and environmental etiology of baseline startle response and fear learning was examined, focusing on fear acquisition and generalization processes using the fear conditioning paradigm measuring fear-potentiated startle (FPS) in a sample of adolescents and young adult twins (15-20 years old). Participants (N = 794) completed fear acquisition and generalization training that consisted of quasi-randomly presented rings of gradually increasing size. The extreme sizes served as conditioned danger cues (CS+) paired with electric shock as the unconditioned stimulus and conditioned safety cues (CS-), with rings of intermediary size serving as generalization stimuli. As an index of fear learning, FPS was measured using the magnitude of eyeblink startle reflex to a sound probe. Twin model estimates indicated that both pre-acquisition startle (startle probe responses to stimuli prior to conditioning) and FPS (startle probe responses after conditioning during acquisition and generalization) exhibited modest to moderate heritability (26%-43%), aligning with previous studies on FPS. We also observed that the genetic influences on FPS were highly correlated with pre-acquisition startle, indicating minimal genetic innovation on FPS. This finding implies that fear responses might be regulated, from a genetic perspective, by general startle response as opposed to specific fear-learning-related factors. We discuss the resulting implications for measurement of biomarkers for fear and anxiety disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.