ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Characterizing HLA-A2-restricted CD8
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recent surveillance has identified the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron ariant, which exhibits the ability to evade multiple neutralizing antibodies generated by prior infection or vaccination. However, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding the CD8 T-cell immune reactivity to the Omicron variant. This study aims to evaluate the characteristics of HLA-A2-restricted CD8 T-cell epitopes from the Omicron variant and analyze epitope-specific CD8 T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccines. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of CD8 T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccines, focusing on HLA-A2-restricted epitopes derived from the Omicron variant. Mutant epitopes were evaluated for their impact on antigen presentation and CD8 T-cell immune reactivity. Additionally, we screened for epitopes that exhibited reduced CD8 T-cell responses following the emergence of the Omicron variant. Results: Our findings revealed that mutant epitopes in the Omicron variant led to escape from antigen presentation and diminished CD8 T-cell immune responses. We identified two epitopes associated with decreased CD8 T-cell reactivity post-Omicron variant emergence. Notably, we discovered an S protein epitope, 67A>V, which demonstrated similar proportions of CD8 T-cell specificity between the ancestral and mutant strains, suggesting its conservation and potential immunogenicity for vaccine development. Furthermore, the third dose of the inactivated vaccine significantly increased the number of epitope-specific CD8 T cells, underscoring the importance of booster doses in enhancing cellular immune responses against the Omicron variant. Discussion: This study highlights the ability of the Omicron variant to evade CD8 T-cell immune responses through epitope mutations, while also identifying conserved epitopes with potential utility in vaccine design. The observed increase in epitope-specific CD8 T cells following a booster dose emphasizes the critical role of additional vaccinations in strengthening cellular immunity against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. These findings provide valuable insights for the development of next-generation vaccines targeting conserved epitopes and optimizing booster strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.