Evidence mapPaperPMID 40171210Full record

ReviewUS cardiology2025

High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: To Measure or Not to Measure?

Adhya Mehta, Roger S Blumenthal, Ty J Gluckman, David I Feldman, Payal Kohli

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in US cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07149961 (Supplementation of Piperine and Curcumin), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07149961 nacompletednot on this map

Supplementation of Piperine and Curcumin (Curcuma Xanthorrhiza) Extract in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction - SPICE STEMI Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitas DiponegoroRan2025 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), Malondialdehyde, Hs-CRP, CurcuminArmsCurcumin plus Piperine, Placebo capsules
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adhya MehtaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Jacobi Medical Center Bronx, NY.
Roger S BlumenthalDivision of Cardiology, Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD.
Ty J GluckmanDivision of Cardiology, Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore, MD.
David I FeldmanMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA.
Payal KohliDepartment of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation and dyslipidemia are central to the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). While lipid-lowering therapies are the cornerstone of ASCVD prevention and treatment, there are other emerging targets, including inflammation (which has been dubbed the 'residual inflammatory risk'), that can be addressed after LDL cholesterol thresholds have been reached. Research over the past 20 years has identified C-reactive protein (CRP) as a key marker of inflammation with atherosclerosis. The association of more sensitive measures of CRP (high- sensitivity C-reactive protein [hsCRP]) with ASCVD risk in epidemiological studies has also led to its incorporation as a risk enhancer in primary prevention guidelines and its incorporation into risk stratification tools. While there are no formal recommendations related to measurement of hsCRP in secondary prevention, consideration should be given to an individualized approach that addresses inflammatory risk in those with major adverse cardiovascular events, despite maximal lipid-lowering therapy and well-controlled LDL cholesterol levels. The aim of this review is to discuss the role of inflammation in ASCVD, the use of hsCRP as a tool to assess residual inflammatory risk to target upstream pathways such as glucose intolerance and obesity, and to consider use of additional anti-inflammatory medications for ASCVD risk reduction. The authors provide clinical context around when to measure hsCRP in clinical practice and how to address residual inflammatory risk in ASCVD.

Indexed as

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseasehigh-sensitivity C-reactive proteininflammationresidual cholesterol riskresidual inflammatory risk

Identifiers

PMID40171210
PMCPMC11959579

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.