ReviewFrontiers in public health2025
Integrating health equity in artificial intelligence for public health in Canada: a rapid narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identifying and alleviating ethical risks of artificial intelligence in physical education: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence in public health: a systematic review on technological efficacy, ethical dilemmas, and governance pathways.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Recommended guidelines concerning artificial intelligence and health equity: a scoping review.Health affairs scholar · 2026Review
- Shaping the Future of Men's Health: How AI Could Be a Transformative Tool for Better Patient Outcomes and Provider Efficiency.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare Policy: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Ethical Responsibility in Medical AI: A Semi-Systematic Thematic Review and Multilevel Governance Model.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and digital health equity: a post-pandemic evidence synthesis and implementation safeguards framework.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- From fragmented to integrated surveillance in LMICs: digital pathways for outbreak detection and vaccine intelligence.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Training the public health workforce for generative AI: validation of the Italian Chatbot Usability Questionnaire.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-enabled early warning systems for public health preparedness: perspectives of senior public health leaders in a Small Island Developing State.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Learning to see clearly again: How critical media engagement can save public health.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Leveraging artificial intelligence for the management of preschool wheeze: A narrative review.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2025Review
- Digital Health Technology Infrastructure Challenges to Support Health Equity in the United States: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Evaluating the Reliability and Quality of Sarcoidosis-Related Information Provided by AI Chatbots.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in public health is rapidly evolving, offering promising advancements in various public health settings across Canada. AI has the potential to enhance the effectiveness, precision, decision-making, and scalability of public health initiatives. However, to leverage AI in public health without exacerbating inequities, health equity considerations must be addressed. This rapid narrative review aims to synthesize health equity considerations related to AI application in public health. Methods: A rapid narrative review methodology was used to identify and synthesize literature on health equity considerations for AI application in public health. After conducting title/abstract and full-text screening of articles, and consensus decision on study inclusion, the data extraction process proceeded using an extraction template. Data synthesis included the identification of challenges and opportunities for strengthening health equity in AI application for public health. Results: The review included 54 peer-review articles and grey literature sources. Several health equity considerations for applying AI in public health were identified, including gaps in AI epistemology, algorithmic bias, accessibility of AI technologies, ethical and privacy concerns, unrepresentative training datasets, lack of transparency and interpretability of AI models, and challenges in scaling technical skills. Conclusion: While AI has the potential to advance public health in Canada, addressing equity is critical to preventing inequities. Opportunities to strengthen health equity in AI include implementing diverse AI frameworks, ensuring human oversight, using advanced modeling techniques to mitigate biases, fostering intersectoral collaboration for equitable AI development, and standardizing ethical and privacy guidelines to enhance AI governance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.