ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2025
Health and incarceration research in Australia: a scoping review.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Management of Withdrawal From Alcohol and Other Drugs in Australian Custodial Settings: A Consensus Statement.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Article
- Hospital-Admitted Injection-Related Infections Among Incarcerated People Who Inject Drugs in Australia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2026Observational
- Article
- Australia's research investment in the health of justice-involved populations.Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: People who experience incarceration often have complex healthcare needs and poorer health than the general population. Australia has the eighth-largest custodial population in the Western Pacific. Understanding the breadth and quality of research on this population's health is crucial for advancing health equity both in Australia and across the region. This scoping review synthesised health research involving people in contact with the criminal justice system in Australia. Methods: We searched eight databases for primary, peer-reviewed research reporting on the health of people incarcerated or previously incarcerated in Australian prisons or youth detention settings. Findings: Our search identified 11,731 unique records, and 508 met the inclusion criteria. Over half (51%) were published between 2015 and 2024. Relatively few studies provided evidence on cognitive disabilities (16%), non-communicable diseases (14%), or sexual and reproductive health (6%). Few focused on youth detention (15%) or post-release health (24%). Only 27 studies (5%) focused exclusively on the health of First Nations Australians. Most studies (86%) came from Australia's most populous states-New South Wales, Queensland, and Victoria-which account for 68% of people incarcerated each year, and 58% of incarcerated First Nations peoples. Interpretation: Despite considerable growth in the number of peer-reviewed studies on the health of people who experience incarceration, critical health issues, key populations, and Australian jurisdictions with the highest incarceration rates require urgent attention. Further high-quality research is needed to fill these evidence gaps and translate research into evidence-based strategies that address the complex and diverse health needs of justice-involved people. Funding: SP was supported by a Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.