ArticleStroke2025
Comparison of the Novel Thrombolytic Constitutively Active ADAMTS13 With Clinical Thrombolytics in a Murine Stroke Model.
Article in Stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum ADAMTS18 Levels at Admission Are Associated With 3-Month Functional Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis · 2026Article
- Thrombolytic resistance: an important factor leading to the failure of intravenous thrombolytic therapy.Journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Toward improved thrombolysis in ischemic stroke: targeting nonfibrin components.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Beyond Direct Fibrinolysis: Novel Approaches to Thrombolysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- AmyloGram reveals amyloidogenic potential in stroke thrombus proteomes.The Biochemical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundr-tPA (recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator) and its variant, TNK (tenecteplase), are the currently approved thrombolytic drugs for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, but they are ineffective in a proportion of patients due to r-tPA resistance of platelet-rich thrombi. A novel thrombolytic, caADAMTS13 (constitutively active a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13) has been shown to improve experimental stroke outcomes where platelet-rich thrombi are present but have not been directly compared with r-tPA or TNK.
methodsWe conducted a direct comparison of caADAMTS13 versus r-tPA versus TNK versus vehicle control in the ferric chloride-mediated distal middle cerebral artery occlusion model in mice, which features platelet and VWF (von Willebrand Factor)-rich thrombi that reproduce r-tPA-resistant occlusion. Treatments were administered intravenously 1 hour after ferric chloride application by bolus injection or bolus followed by infusion, as translationally applicable. Laser speckle contrast imaging measured early reperfusion over the hour following treatment, and magnetic resonance imaging measured cerebral blood flow and lesion volume at 24 hours.
resultsReperfusion 1 hour after treatment was greatest in caADAMTS13-treated animals. Later cerebral blood flow, 24 hours post-treatment, within the stroke-affected hypoperfused area was higher in caADAMTS13 and r-tPA but not TNK-treated mice. Functionally, this led to the absence of an initial behavioral deficit in caADAMTS13-treated mice, alongside a smaller lesion volume at 24 hours and reduced extent of bleeding.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate an overall suggestion that caADAMTS13 has improved thrombolytic efficacy, compared with current stroke treatments, against platelet-rich thrombi, for which there is currently an unmet clinical need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.