ReviewInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Ischemic and non-ischemic myocardial injuries at autopsy- an overview for forensic pathologists.
Review in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Forensic Approach to Perioperative Deaths After Non-Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Role of Inflammation in Takotsubo Syndrome: From Pathogenic Pathways To Imaging Insights and Therapeutic Perspectives.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Serum periostin levels in myocardial infarction: Findings from forensic autopsy cases.PloS one · 2026Article
- Histopathological Profile of the Heart in Sudden Death: Forensic Perspectives on Cardiac and Noncardiac Mechanisms.International journal of applied & basic medical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are major causes of morbidity and death worldwide, and most cardiac deaths are related to ischemic injury of the myocardium (myocardial infarction). As underlined in the current clinical definition and classification of myocardial infarctions, not all myocardial injuries are due to ischemia: irreversible injury, ending in necrosis, can be induced also by various other factors, such as infections, immune disorders, physical and chemical agents, and trauma. This is supported by clinical studies showing that elevated serum levels of cardiac troponins, as a measure of myocardial damage, are also a common finding in the non-ischemic types of myocardial injury. Forensic pathologists confronted with autopsy findings suggestive of myocardial injury should therefore realize that both ischemic and non-ischemic forms of myocardial death can be observed, and not only in natural but also non-natural deaths (intoxications, asphyxia, traumatic and iatrogenic deaths, and others). Distinguishing these different types of injuries and underlying diseases or circumstances of death is critical, not only to determine the cause and mechanism of death, but also to help investigate often challenging medico-legal scenarios. This article reviews the broad spectrum of ischemic and non-ischemic myocardial injuries in natural and violent deaths. From this perspective we propose a diagnostic approach to myocardial injuries in a forensic pathology context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.