ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2025
The cardiovascular effects of interleukin-6 inhibition in patients with severe coronavirus-19 infection.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association and impact of inflammatory markers and cardiac structure on atrial fibrillation risk: a study integrating NHANES with real-world data.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic illustrated the relationship between cardiac arrhythmias and pro-inflammatory states. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), have significant effects on cardiac conduction. Atrial or ventricular arrhythmias occurring while infected results in a doubling of mortality. Tocilizumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks the IL-6 receptor, is associated with improved mortality and is believed to be related to immune modulation of the COVID-19-related hyperinflammatory state.MethodsA single-center retrospective review of all patients with severe COVID-19, defined as admission to an intensive care unit or requirement of respiratory or circulatory support, from March 2020 through March 2022, was conducted. Patients who received or did not receive tocilizumab were grouped into the treatment and control groups, respectively.ResultsFour hundred seventy-three patients were reviewed and 400 met the criteria for inclusion in our study. There were 305 patients (age, 63 ± 13 years, 58% male) in the control group and 95 (age, 57 ± 15 years, 51% male) in the treatment group. In-hospital mortality was greatly reduced with tocilizumab compared with controls (44.2% vs 85.9%, p < 0.001) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) showed a statistically significant reduction (17.8% vs 29.5%, p = 0.019). New-onset wall motion abnormalities, potentially related to myocarditis or acute coronary syndrome, also trended toward significance with tocilizumab (7.7% vs 15.7%, p = 0.10). Deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, stroke, and sustained ventricular arrhythmias did not meet statistical significance.ConclusionAs expected, tocilizumab did show significant improvement in mortality. Tocilizumab also showed a significant reduction of new-onset AF. Other cardiac structural endpoints did not reach statistical significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.