ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Examining the Client Experience of Digital Tools in Blended Care Therapy: Qualitative Interview Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLyra Health's short-term blended care therapy model, Lyra Care Therapy (LCT), has demonstrated effectiveness at scale. In LCT, clients participate in synchronous telehealth sessions and asynchronous guided practice sessions, in which they are provided with digital tools to reinforce key concepts and skills. These digital tools include animated video lessons that use storytelling to show characters learning and implementing new skills from therapy, written psychoeducational materials, interactive exercises that prompt reflection and skills practice, symptom assessments, and messaging with therapists. Past research on LCT found that time spent in therapy sessions and viewing digital video lessons predicts improvements in depression and anxiety symptoms.
objectiveThis study aims to explore the client experience of LCT digital tools and to understand clients' perceived benefits and challenges of using digital tools while in LCT.
methodsIn total, 12 ethnically and racially diverse adults (5 male, 6 female, and 1 pangender) who had graduated from LCT in the previous 4 months participated in semistructured interviews. Interviews focused on experiences with the digital components of LCT (ie, video lessons, symptom assessments, and written exercises). Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analytic methods to determine the benefits and challenges associated with components of the LCT model.
resultsIn total, 3 primary themes were generated through thematic analysis. These themes centered around supporting knowledge and skill development, the benefits and challenges associated with the range of digital tools, and the combination of flexibility and accountability promoting positive change. First, we summarize the ways in which guided practice sessions allow clients to develop additional knowledge and learn skills related to their mental health and well-being. Then, we describe how the range of digital tools included in LCT presents different benefits and challenges for clients. Finally, we discuss how flexibility inherent in having both synchronous and asynchronous sessions, along with the accountability from a provider, encourages clients to continue to practice skills related to their mental health and well-being.
conclusionsResults provide insights into the unique contributions of different components of the LCT model on therapeutic gains. While perceived time constraints and content preferences can impact engagement with digital tools, overall the digital tools were perceived as carrying significant value for participants in the LCT program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.