Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40175035›Full record

ReviewAdvances in kidney disease and health2025

Embedding Equity and Inclusion Principles Into Nephrology Board Examinations: An Essential Part of Our Path Toward Kidney Health Justice.

Dinushika Mohottige, Samira Farouk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in kidney disease and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dinushika MohottigeBarbara T. Murphy Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Institute for Health Equity Research, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY. Electronic address: Dinushika.mohottige@mountsinai.org.
Samira FaroukBarbara T. Murphy Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Recanati Miller Transplant Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY.

Funding

Structural Racism as a "Third hit" on kidney outcomes of Black individuals with APOL1 risk allelesK23DK139454 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI Dinushika Mohottige · 2024 to 2026
$583k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK139454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recognition of widespread health inequalities across disease conditions and their startling impact on morbidity and health care costs have motivated multiple professional societies to ensure board examinations reflect and enhance inclusive, anti-biased, and equitable care. In this perspective, we offer five nephrology case examples and accompanying learning objectives to demonstrate how principles of inclusion, equity, and anti-bias can be embedded into nephrology examinations to enhance care for all populations.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth EquityNephrologySocial JusticeSpecialty BoardsHumansEquityInclusionNephrology certifying exam questions

Identifiers

PMID40175035
PMCPMC11970355

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.