Evidence mapPaperPMID 40175298Full record

ReviewFEMS microbiology reviews2025

Seven critical challenges in synthetic one-carbon assimilation and their potential solutions.

Òscar Puiggené, Giusi Favoino, Filippo Federici, Michele Partipilo, Enrico Orsi, Maria V G Alván-Vargas, Javier M Hernández-Sancho, Nienke K Dekker, Emil C Ørsted, Eray U Bozkurt and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEMS microbiology reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. FormatotrophicSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Natural and Synthetic Metabolic Architectures.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Functional organization and regulatory logic of theApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Synthetic CmBio · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Òscar PuiggenéThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Giusi FavoinoThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Filippo FedericiThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Michele PartipiloThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Enrico OrsiThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Maria V G Alván-VargasThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Javier M Hernández-SanchoThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Nienke K DekkerThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Emil C ØrstedThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Eray U BozkurtThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Sara GrassiThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Julia Martí-PagésThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Daniel C VolkeThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Pablo I NikelThe Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Biosustainability, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9313-7481

Funding

European Union 814418Novo Nordisk Foundation NNF20CC0035580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic C1 assimilation holds the promise of facilitating carbon capture while mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, yet practical implementation in microbial hosts remains relatively limited. Despite substantial progress in pathway design and prototyping, most efforts stay at the proof-of-concept stage, with frequent failures observed even under in vitro conditions. This review identifies seven major barriers constraining the deployment of synthetic C1 metabolism in microorganisms and proposes targeted strategies for overcoming these issues. A primary limitation is the low catalytic activity of carbon-fixing enzymes, particularly carboxylases, which restricts the overall pathway performance. In parallel, challenges in expressing multiple heterologous genes-especially those encoding metal-dependent or oxygen-sensitive enzymes-further hinder pathway functionality. At the systems level, synthetic C1 pathways often exhibit poor flux distribution, limited integration with the host metabolism, accumulation of toxic intermediates, and disruptions in redox and energy balance. These factors collectively reduce biomass formation and compromise product yields in biotechnological setups. Overcoming these interconnected challenges is essential for moving synthetic C1 assimilation beyond conceptual stages and enabling its application in scalable, efficient bioprocesses towards a circular bioeconomy.

Indexed as

BacteriaCarbonMetabolic EngineeringBiotechnologyCarbonC1 feedstockformaldehydeformatemetabolic engineeringmethanolsynthetic biologysynthetic metabolism

Identifiers

PMID40175298
PMCPMC12010959

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.