ArticleScientific reports2025
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of disseminated intravascular coagulation in critically ill children.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning on the Pediatric Intensive Care (PIC) Database: PIC-Powered Prediction.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine learning early risk assessment model for acute kidney injury in critically ill children: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Differential analysis of coagulation indices (PT, APTT, d-dimer) in different types of thrombophilia.Medicine · 2025Observational
- [Recent advances in artificial intelligence for auxiliary diagnosis and management of neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a thrombo-hemorrhagic disorder that can be life-threatening in critically ill children, and the quest for an accurate and efficient method for early DIC prediction is of paramount importance. Candidate predictors encompassed demographics, comorbidities, laboratory findings, and therapy strategies. A stepwise logistic regression model was employed to select the features included in the final model. Six machine learning algorithms-logistic regression (LR), extreme gradient boosting (XGB), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), and k-nearest neighbor (KNN)-were employed to construct predictive models for DIC in critically ill children. Models were then evaluated by using area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), precision, recall and decision curve analysis (DCA). Interpretation of the optimal model was conducted using shapley additive explanations (SHAP). A total of 6093 critically ill children were encompassed in this study, of whom 681 (11.2%) developed DIC. The RF model exhibited the highest levels of accuracy (0.856), sensitivity (0.866), Kappa (0.472), NPV (0.423), and recall (0.866). However, the XGB model outperformed RF, LR, SVM, DT, and KNN in terms of AUC (0.908), specificity (0.859), PPV (0.978), and precision (0.969). Decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed the superior clinical utility of the XGB model. Overall, the XGB model demonstrated superior clinical utility compared to RF, LR, SVM, DT, and KNN. We named the final model Alfalfa-PICU-DIC. SHAP analysis identified D-dimer, INR, PT, TT, and PLT count as the top predictors of DIC. Machine learning models can be a reliable tool for predicting DIC in critically ill children, which will facilitate timely intervention, thereby reducing the burden of DIC on patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.