Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2025
Random forest and Shapley Additive exPlanations predict oxytocin targeted effects on brain functional networks involved in salience and sensorimotor processing, in a randomized clinical trial in autism.
Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generating Biologically Relevant Subtypes of Autism Spectrum Disorder with differential responses to Acute Oxytocin Administration in a Randomized Trial using Random Forest Models and K-means Clustering.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- A predictive study of glycaemic reversal in Chinese individuals with prediabetes based on machine learning: a 5-year cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intranasal oxytocin (IN-OXT) has shown some promises in rescuing social deficits in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) as well as some inconsistencies in long-term trials. We conducted a target engagement study to study the precise effects of different doses of IN-OXT on brain resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) in ASD. We examined the effects of varying doses of IN-OXT (0 IU, 8 IU, 24 IU, 48 IU) on rsFC in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, within-subject design in 30 male adults with ASD and 17 neurotypical controls (NT) receiving placebo. Random forest analysis was used to classify individuals as ASD or NT. Shapely Additive explanations values were calculated to rank brain functional networks by level of contribution to ASD deficits and to evaluate IN-OXT dose effects. The model predicted ASD diagnosis with an AUC of 94%. Hypoconnectivity between salience/empathy and visual networks, and hyperconnectivity between reward and sensorimotor networks and theory of mind networks were among the strongest predictors of ASD deficits. IN-OXT had a dose-dependent effect on rescuing both deficits described above. Overall, 48 IU dose was more effective, and 24 IU dose was more effective in those who have lower DNA OXT receptor methylation and lower severity of clinical symptoms. Higher doses of OXT might be necessary to enhance empathic responses, and ASD individuals with less support needs and with a preserved OXT system might benefit most from OXT treatment. Applying machine learning approaches in OXT research can provide data-driven unbiased results that can inform future clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.