Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Clinical risk score to predict poor coronary collateralization in type 2 diabetic patients with chronic total occlusion.
Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06054126 (The Development of Coronary Collateralization in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Development of Coronary Collateralization in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Chronic Total Occlusion
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk stacking in peripheral artery disease (PAD): Integrating genetics, cardiometabolic disease and social determinants of health to explain worsening PAD outcomes.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Distinct immune-metabolic phenotypes underlie poor coronary collateral circulation.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Article
- The Association Between Naples Prognostic Score and Coronary Collateral Circulation in Patients with Chronic Coronary Total Occlusion.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study sought to develop and externally validate a score that predicts the probability for poor coronary collateralization (CC) in stable angina patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
methodsClinical and laboratory variables were collected on admission in 1022 T2DM patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO). Coronary collaterals with Rentrop score 0 or 1 were considered as poor CC. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors for poor CC. The external validation cohort comprised 234 T2DM patients with CTO selected randomly from an independent external center.
resultsEight predictors were independently associated with poor CC and applied to construct the risk model. A score incorporating these factors predicted poor CC, ranging from 7% when all factors were absent to 97% when ≥ 7 factors were present. Internal validation showed an AUC of 0.748 (95%CI, 0.695-0.795) and the external validation had an AUC of 0.754 (95%CI, 0.694-0.808). A cumulative predictive score was developed by summing points assigned to each factor based on its regression coefficient. Smoking and neutrophil > 6.5 × 10⁹/L were assigned 3 points, female gender, hypercholesterolemia, and eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² were assigned 2 points, age > 65 years, hypertension, and HbA1c > 6.5% were assigned 1 point. The optimal cutoff score was 4 for predicting poor CC with sensitivity 75.4% and specificity 64.1%.
conclusionsWe have demonstrated a risk score based on clinical and laboratory characteristics providing an easy-to-use tool to predict poor CC in T2DM patients with stable coronary artery disease. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT06054126 Date of registration: September 19th, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.