ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
A prospective study of early pregnancy metal concentrations and gestational diabetes mellitus based on a birth cohort in Northwest China.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Mapping of Macronutrient Consumption Before Pregnancy Related to Gestational Diabetes Mellitus.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Association between blood essential metal elements in early pregnancy and gestational diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The role of dysregulated copper metabolism in diabetes and its complications: a review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExposure to metals during early pregnancy may affect maternal glucose metabolism. We were aimed to assess the associations between early pregnancy whole blood concentrations of copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), and magnesium (Mg) with GDM later in the second trimester among pregnant women in Northwest China.
methodsThis study included 5478 first-trimester pregnant women who participated in the birth cohort of the Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital between July 2018 and December 2023. Metal concentrations, basic demographic characteristics, lifestyle and behavior patterns were collected. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed in the second trimester. A generalized linear model was used to analyze the effects of metal concentrations on GDM. A two-piecewise regression model was adopted to examine the threshold effect and find out the turning point. Weighted Quantile Sum (WQS) regression was conducted using a dataset randomly split into training and validation sets at a 4:6 ratio to investigate the association between metal mixtures and GDM.
resultsCompared to the lowest tertile, the middle (RR = 0.82, 95%CI = 0.71, 0.95) and highest (RR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.73, 0.97) tertiles of Ca concentrations could decrease the risk of GDM. However, the highest tertile of Cu concentration could increase the risk of GDM (RR = 1.18, 95%CI = 1.01, 1.39). Additionally, a non-linear relationship between Ca concentration with GDM and FPG was observed. The risk of GDM (RR = 0.08, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.31) and FPG (β=-0.56, 95%CI: -0.99, -0.12) decreased with 1 unit increase in ln-transformed Ca concentration below the turning point. However, the WQS index of maternal mixed metals was not correlated with the incidence of GDM (RR = 1.08, 95%CI = 0.98, 1.19).
conclusionsHigher Cu concentration during early pregnancy may increase the risk of GDM in mothers. Increased Ca concentration may reduce the risk of GDM and lower the concentration of FPG below the turning point. Our findings could provide an early marker for potentially modifiable risk factors associated with maternal glucose dysregulation during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.