SynthesisBMC health services research2025
A realist review of factors critical for the implementation of eHealth in chronic disease management.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions on Health Outcomes in Adult Patients With Intestinal Stoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.International journal of nursing practice · 2026Pooled it
- Does multidisciplinary disease management program lower hospitalization and mortality among patients with heart failure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Assessment of the ADLIFE intervention as a digital solution for patients with advanced chronic diseases: a quasi-experimental trial.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Using Group Chats to Drive Behavior Change in Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review and Realist Synthesis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Two decades of change: The evolution of Canadian public health organizations in chronic disease prevention, 2004-2023.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Canada, chronic disease is responsible for 88% of deaths and $120 billion in cost each year. With 44% of Canadian adults living with at least one chronic condition, only 66% receive necessary care. Ehealth interventions are instrumental in chronic disease management (CDM), especially since the pandemic, as they provide accessible, cost-effective solutions for self-management. Despite its promise and accelerated use, its implementation remains challenging. This paper reports on a realist review of critical factors for the implementation of eHealth interventions relevant to conditions such as heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes. The findings are presented in terms of context, mechanisms, and outcomes.
methodsA realist review of the primary literature was conducted by searching five databases: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, CINALH and PsycInfo. The initial search was run for a date spanning from the databases' inception to September 2018 and subsequently updated to dates spanning from October 2018 to May 2022. A systematic and iterative approach to data extraction was used. Thematic analysis was used to identify context-mechanism-outcome (CMO) configurations.
resultsAmong the 13,209 citations retrieved, 64 articles were included. This paper reports the top ten configurations found to facilitate or hinder eHealth implementation. Key themes related to context, such as team-based care, and action, including program use, perceived usefulness and motivation, are reported.
conclusionsThis study explores the role of context, mechanisms, and outcomes in ehealth implementation, highlighting the nonlinear relationships between these factors. Future implications include empirical testing CMOs as middle-range theories in real-world settings to determine causality.
trial registrationThe review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020208275) on 1 October 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.