ArticleBMC surgery2025
Orienting global surgery initiatives toward advancing minimally invasive surgery in Africa: a commentary based on continent-wide reviews.
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing the management of laparoscopic equipment in low-resource settings: a SAGES White Paper.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Robotic and Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Africa: Current Adoption, Challenges, and Future Horizons.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2026Review
- Bridging the gap: feasibility and future directions of robotic surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa-a narrative review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical care has advanced with the introduction of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques, which have resulted in a reduced length of hospital stay and improved patient outcomes with regard to morbidity, mortality, and aesthetics. Implementation in Africa remains limited due to economic, infrastructural, and training-related issues. Our previous reviews show that adoption of MIS in Africa has been highly variable. Only Egypt and South Africa, for example, have significantly reported robotic surgery programs. Despite present challenges, recent developments show that progress is being made. Advantages of MIS in resource-limited settings include fewer postoperative complications and shorter hospital stays, crucial for African patients who cannot afford unexpectedly extensive postoperative care and are also reliant on daily earnings. In the future, tele-robotic surgery can improve access to surgical care in under-served regions of the continent. Implementation barriers include the high cost of equipment, inadequate healthcare infrastructure, and limited training opportunities. Investment in the development of low-cost innovations, such as MIS equipment suited for resource-limited settings, local manufacturing or assembly of MIS equipment, and the establishment of training programs within the continent, is necessary to overcome these challenges. Policies supporting the integration of MIS into national healthcare plans are also required. The development of more robust MIS programs in Africa will not only enhance surgical care but will also contribute to the improvement of healthcare and economic outcomes across the continent. We present this commentary on the current state, challenges, and opportunities for the wider adoption of MIS across Africa, based on recent continent-wide reviews.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.