ArticleGlobal health research and policy2025
Impact of health intervention coverage on reducing maternal mortality in 126 low- and middle-income countries: a Lives Saved Tool modelling study.
Article in Global health research and policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a continued and urgent need to address the stagnation of the global maternal mortality ratio (MMR), especially for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to assess the impact of scaling up health intervention coverage on reducing MMR under four scenarios for 126 LMICs.
methodsWe conducted the modelling study to estimate MMR and additional maternal lives saved by intervention by 2030 for 126 LMICs using the Lives Saved Tool (LiST). We applied four scenarios to assess the impact of scaling up health intervention coverage with no scale-up (no change), a modest scale-up (increased by 2% per year), a substantial scale-up (increased by 5% per year), and universal coverage (coverage reached 95% by 2030). In sensitivity analysis, with the current trend, we assumed that coverage of each intervention remained unchanged from 2024, with MMR changing according to the annual percentage change (APC) of 2015-2020.
resultsAmong the 126 LMICs, 31.7% (40/126) countries showed an increase in MMR, and 38.1% (48/126) stalled on the reduction of MMR from 2015 to 2020. With a modest, substantial, or universal scale-up, the 2030 average MMR would be 172.1 (117.6-262.9), 139.8 (95.6-213.5) or 98.6 (67.8-149.7), not reaching the SDG Target 3.1. Additional maternal lives saved by scaling up the coverage of health interventions were mainly clustered in the African Region, the Southeast Asia Region, and the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Compared with other included interventions, uterotonics for postpartum hemorrhage, assisted vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery played more important roles in reducing maternal mortality.
conclusionsThe study findings highlighted that even under a substantial scale-up of intervention coverage or scaling up to universal coverage of interventions, it would be difficult for the 126 LMICs to achieve the SDG Target 3.1 on time. Optimizing the allocation of health resources, promoting health equality, taking more decisive national, regional and global actions are urgently needed for LMICs to reduce MMR and reach the SDG Target 3.1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.