ArticleMobile DNA2025
Retand LTR-retrotransposons in plants: a long way from pol to 3'LTR.
Article in Mobile DNA, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hide and seek: de novo identification in sugar beet reveals impact of non-autonomous LTR retrotransposons.Mobile DNA · 2026Article
- Host Factors Promoting the LTR Retrotransposon Life Cycle in Plant Cells: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPlant Gypsy LTR-retrotransposons are classified into lineages according to the phylogenetic relationships of the reverse transcriptase. Retand is a lineage of non-chromovirus elements characterized by the presence of a long internal region compared to other lineages.
resultsThis work focuses on the identification and characterization of Potentially Recently Active Retand Elements (PRAREs) in 617 genomic sequence assemblies of Viridiplantae species. The Retand elements were considered PRAREs if their LTRs and insertion sequences were identical, and the sizes of their internal regions and LTRs did not differ by more than 2% from the consensus. A total of 2,735 PRAREs were identified, distributed in 122 clusters corresponding to 34 species, with copy numbers per cluster varying between 1 and 180. They are present in Eudicotyledons and Liliopsida but not in other groups of plants. Some PRAREs are non-autonomous elements, lacking some of the typical LTR retrotransposon coding domains. The size of the POL-3'LTR regions varies between 2,933 and 6,566 bp, and in all cases, includes potential coding regions oriented antisense to the gag and pol genes. 97% of the clusters contain antisense ORFs encoding the TRP28 protein domain of unknown function. The analysis of the consensus TRP28 domain indicates that it probably can bind DNA. About half of the PRAREs contain arrays of tandem repeats in the POL-3'LTR region.
conclusionsThe large internal region of the Retand elements is due to the presence of a long POL-3'LTR region. This region frequently contains arrays of tandem repeats that contribute to the expansion of this area. The presence of antisense ORFs in the POL-3'LTR region is also a common feature in these elements, many of which encode proteins with conserved domains, especially the TRP28 domain. The possible function of these TRP28-containing proteins is unknown, but their potential DNA binding capacity and the comparison with similar genes in some retroviruses suggest that they may play a regulatory role in the Retand transposition process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.