SynthesisJournal of health, population, and nutrition2025
Dominance of antimicrobial resistance bacteria and risk factors of bacteriuria infection among pregnant women in East Africa: implications for public health.
Synthesis in Journal of health, population, and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phytochemical composition, in vitro antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Dorstenia barnimiana Schweinf leaf extracts.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
- Mortality burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in East Africa: pooled analysis of modelled estimates.Tropical medicine and health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBacterial infections in pregnancy pose significant health risks in East Africa. This study estimates pooled prevalence and identifies key risk factors, addressing limited data to improve maternal health outcomes in the region.
methodsThis study employed a systematic review and meta-analysis, analyzing data from eight East African studies (2016-2021). Searches spanned PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and more, with manual reference checks. Data quality was assessed via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RevMan software with a random-effects model estimated pooled prevalence and hazard ratios for risk factors.
resultsA pooled analysis of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) bacterial isolates from pregnant women in East Africa highlights concerning prevalence rates of various pathogens. Escherichia coli emerged as the most common pathogen, present in 43% (95% CI: 37-48%) of cases, followed by Staphylococcus aureus at 20% (95% CI: 0.12, 0.29) and Corynebacterium, Enterococcus, and Nocardia species (CONs) in 16% (95% CI: 10-23%) and 16% (95% CI: 12-21%) (Prevalence of K. pneumoniae). A very small proportion 6% (95% CI: 2 - 11%) was found to be infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The forest plot highlights risk factors for infections in pregnant women in East Africa: antibiotic use (HR: 2.0, 95% CI: 1.5-2.6), smoking (HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0-1.6), poor sanitation (HR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.2-2.4), diabetes (HR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5-2.8), and age > 30 years (HR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1-2.0).
conclusionsThis analysis reveals a significant prevalence of bacterial infections, particularly Escherichia coli, among pregnant women in East Africa, with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) complicating treatment. The study identified several key risk factors, including antibiotic use, smoking, poor sanitation, diabetes, and age over 30, which are associated with higher rates of infection. While these findings emphasize the need for further research, the results suggest that routine bacterial screening, AMR surveillance, improved sanitation, and antibiotic stewardship are important steps in mitigating the impact of these infections. Public health strategies should prioritize high-risk groups, encourage hygiene practices, and continue to guide policy and interventions through ongoing studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.