ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- P38MAPK targeting in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Promising interventional approach for breaking drug resistance and tumor control.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2026Article
- The Significance of STAT3 in Colonic Diseases: A Comprehensive Study of Pathological Roles and Therapeutic Implications.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2025Review
- Herbal Medicine for Colorectal Cancer Treatment: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Applications.Cell proliferation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer related-death worldwide, and resistance to 5-fluorouracil (5FU, a key component of chemotherapy regimens, is a major clinical concern. We have previously elucidated the effects of Methods: MTT assay was used to assess cell viability. Muse analyzer was used to assess cell viability, cell cycle distribution, and apoptosis. Additionally, colony formation and growth assays and western blots were performed. Results: We found that RCE inhibited the viability and colony formation and growth capacities of HCT-116-WT and HCT-116-5FU-R cells. The antiproliferative effects were attributed to DNA damage-mediated impairment of cell cycle at S phase, and induction of Beclin-1-independent autophagy in both cell lines. Mechanistically, inhibition of the mTOR, STAT3 and p38 MAPK pathways was implicated in the latter. Additionally, RCE induced caspase-7-independent apoptosis in HCT-116-WT cells. However, HCT-116-5FU-R cells were resistant to apoptosis through upregulation of survivin, and downregulation of Bax. Using autophagy and proteasome inhibitors, we clarified that autophagy and the proteasome pathway contributed to RCE-mediated cell death in HCT-116-WT and HCT-116-5FU-R cells. Lastly, we confirmed RCE inhibited the growth of both HCT-116-WT and HCT-116-5FU-R xenografts in a chick embryo model. Discussion: Collectively, our findings highlight that RCE is a source of phytochemicals that can be used as anticancer agents for 5FU-resistant CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.