ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Socioeconomic determinants of low birth weight and its association with peripubertal obesity in Brazil.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Low birth weight (LBW) is an early life adversity associated with various risk factors and metabolic dysfunction throughout life. However, the role of socioeconomic factors in the association between LBW and peripubertal health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remains unclear. This ecological study investigated the factors contributing to LBW and its impacts in Brazil. Methods: Data were collected from the Global Health Data Exchange as summary exposure values (SEVs), which serve as a proxy for population prevalence weighted by the relative risk. Additionally, information was sourced from official Brazilian government resources covering the years 1995 to 2017, resulting in a total of 338 state-year observations applied for temporal lagged analyses. First, we tested the SEV of 1-year lagged reproductive-age population (15-49 years) risk factors as exposures and the SEV of LBW as an outcome. In the second temporal lagged analysis, we tested the association between the SEV of LBW as the primary exposure and the SEV of high body mass index (HBMI) in peripubertal population 10 years later as the outcome. Fixed-effects multivariable linear regression models with lags were constructed, adjusting for socioeconomic covariates. Results: The exposure of the reproductive-age population to smoking, alcohol, high systolic blood pressure, and HBMI was positively associated with the SEV of LBW. A diet high in sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB diet) was also positively associated, but the association disappeared when GDP per capita and access to primary care were added to the model. Regarding the repercussions of LBW, a 1-point increase in the SEV of LBW was associated with a 1.6-point increase in HBMI in the peripubertal population (95% CI: 0.66 to 2.55). However, this association disappeared after adjusting for GDP per capita and access to primary care, indicating their confounding roles. Discussion: Our study highlights several risk factors in the adult population associated with LBW and its relationship with peripubertal HBMI. Interestingly, GDP per capita and access to primary care were found to be the socioeconomic determinants for birth outcomes as a result of exposure to the risk factors tested and the mid-term effects of LBW. These findings enhance our understanding of the role of socioeconomic factors contributing to LBW in LMICs and the need for public policies addressing healthcare and welfare to reduce the burden of LBW in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.