Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177633›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

A crosstalk between adhesion and phagocytosis integrates macrophage functions into their microenvironment.

Manon Depierre, Anna Mularski, Artur Ruppel, Christophe Le Clainche, Martial Balland, Florence Niedergang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Manon DepierreUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, INSERM, CNRS, 75014 Paris, France.
Anna MularskiUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, INSERM, CNRS, 75014 Paris, France.
Artur RuppelUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Physics (LIPhy), Grenoble, France.
Christophe Le ClaincheUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Martial BallandUniversité Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Interdisciplinary Laboratory of Physics (LIPhy), Grenoble, France.
Florence NiedergangUniversité Paris Cité, Institut Cochin, INSERM, CNRS, 75014 Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phagocytosis is the process of actin-dependent internalization and degradation of large particles. Macrophages, which are professional phagocytes, are present in all tissues and are, thus, exposed to environments with different mechanical properties. How mechanical cues from macrophages' environment affect their ability to phagocytose and, in turn, how phagocytosis influences how phagocytic cells interact with their environment remain poorly understood. We found that the ability of macrophages to perform phagocytosis varied with the substrate stiffness. Using live traction force microscopy, we showed that phagocytosing macrophages applied more dynamic traction forces to their substrate. In addition, integrin-mediated phagocytosis triggered a transient loss of podosomes that was associated with decreased degradation of the extracellular matrix, concomitantly with RhoA activation and F-actin recruitment at phagocytic cups. Overall, these results highlight a crosstalk between macrophage phagocytosis and cell adhesion. Mechanical properties of the microenvironment influence phagocytosis, which, in turn, impacts how macrophages interact with their surroundings.

Indexed as

Cell biologyFunctional aspects of cell biologyOrganizational aspects of cell biologySpecialized functions of cells

Identifiers

PMID40177633
PMCPMC11964680

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.