ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2025
Genetically encoded sensors illuminate
Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Illuminating the Future of Catecholamine Detection.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
- Continuous monitoring of glutamate using electroactive templated polymers as synthetic molecular receptors.The Analyst · 2026Article
- Glial-Dopamine crosstalk: Astrocytic and microglial gatekeepers of neuroinflammation, plasticity, and motivation.AIMS neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Limitations in existing tools have hindered neuroscientists from achieving a deeper understanding of complex behaviors and diseases. The recent development and optimization of genetically encoded sensors offer a powerful solution for investigating intricate dynamics such as calcium influx, membrane potential, and the release of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators. In contrast, traditional methods are constrained by insufficient spatial and/or temporal resolution, low sensitivity, and stringent application conditions. Genetically encoded sensors have gained widespread popularity due to their advantageous features, which stem from their genetic encoding and optical imaging capabilities. These include broad applicability, tissue specificity, and non-invasive operation. When combined with advanced microscopic techniques, optogenetics, and machine learning approaches, these sensors have become versatile tools for studying neuronal circuits in intact living systems, providing millisecond-scale temporal resolution and spatial resolution ranging from nanometers to micrometers. In this review, we highlight the advantages of genetically encoded sensors over traditional methods in the study of neurotransmission. We also discuss their recent advancements, diverse applications, and optimization strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.