ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular interventions2025
Age-Related Outcomes After Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: An Analysis of BEST-CLI.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe impact of age on outcomes after revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia has not been studied in a prospective trial.
methodsA total of 1780 patients were grouped into age quartiles (≤55 years, 55< age ≤65 years, 65< age ≤75 years, and >75 years) and by type of revascularization (open bypass or endovascular). The primary outcome was major adverse limb events (MALE) or death, and the secondary outcomes were above-ankle amputation, reintervention, and major adverse cardiovascular events.
resultsDeath and major adverse cardiovascular events were significantly higher in the oldest quartile (>75 years), whereas MALE and above-ankle amputation were highest in the youngest cohort (≤55 years). Younger patients (≤55 years) had the lowest adjusted risk of MALE or all-cause death with open bypass compared with endovascular revascularization. There was no difference in MALE or all-cause death by treatment strategy in patients >75 years of age.
conclusionsOlder age was associated with the highest risks of death and major adverse cardiovascular events and the lowest risks of MALE and above-ankle amputation among patients enrolled in BEST-CLI (Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia). Age also had a differential impact by revascularization strategy: youngest patients had the lowest risk of MALE and all-cause death with bypass surgery compared with endovascular revascularization, while there was no difference among those >75 years. These data should be used to facilitate shared decision-making in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. REGISTRATION: URL: https://biolincc.nhlbi.nih.gov/studies/best_cli/; Unique identifier: HLB02932424a.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.