Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40178039›Full record

SynthesisCancer medicine2025

Clinical Prediction Models for Contact X-Ray Brachytherapy in Managing Rectal Cancers: A Scoping Review.

Muneeb Ul Haq, D Mark Pritchard, Arthur Sun Myint, Muhammad Ahsan Javed, Carrie A Duckworth, Ngu Wah Than, Laura J Bonnett, David M Hughes

Abstract readScoping ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muneeb Ul HaqInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2303-7469
D Mark PritchardInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Arthur Sun MyintThe Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Muhammad Ahsan JavedLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Carrie A DuckworthInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ngu Wah ThanInstitute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Laura J BonnettDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
David M HughesDepartment of Health Data Science, Institute of Population Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions No 857894-CAST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, there are no clinically predictive models that can prognosticate the response of rectal cancers to Contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB). This review aims to critically evaluate existing models that have attempted to predict the response of rectal cancer to external beam radiotherapy, with the objective of laying the foundation for the development of a CXB-specific prediction model.

methodsA random-effects meta-analysis was employed to calculate pooled estimates of the discriminative ability of published models. Using the Prediction Model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST), each model was evaluated for its risk of bias and applicability. Additionally, the frequency of commonly utilised predictive factors was documented.

resultsTwelve papers discussed fifteen models based on pre-treatment factors. Models predicting response based on the Tumour regression grade (TRG) classified responders as patients who achieved a complete response or near complete response and achieved a pooled AUC of 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.89). Models that predicted pathologic complete response (pCR) had a pooled AUC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.71-0.82). The most utilised predictive parameters were age, tumour grade and T stage. However, these models were prone to significant risk of bias and had limited applicability to the general population.

conclusionsAlthough the existing models were statistically robust, they lacked broad applicability. This was primarily due to a lack of external validation, which limits their clinical utility. A future CXB-specific model should prioritise dedicated data collection based on pre-calculated sample size and include the predictive factors identified in this review.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyRectal NeoplasmsHumansPrognosisTreatment Outcomebrachytherapyclinical prediction modelsrectal cancers

Identifiers

PMID40178039
PMCPMC11966560

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.