Evidence mapPaperPMID 40178490Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in neurology2025

Recent developments in multiple sclerosis neuropathology.

Christine Stadelmann, Jonas Franz, Stefan Nessler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christine StadelmannDepartment of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
Jonas Franz
Stefan Nessler

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewNeuropathological studies in human brain tissue are indispensable for our understanding of disease mechanisms in multiple sclerosis (MS). They inform concepts of lesion evolution, tissue regeneration and disease progression, and ideally reveal new disease mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Here we review recent neuropathological studies that have advanced our knowledge of MS pathogenesis. RECENT

findingsRecent cohort studies support the notion that different clinical MS disease phenotypes share underlying pathological features, and that clinical and pathological heterogeneity is derived from a variable combination of innate and adaptive inflammation, demyelinating activity, and neuroaxonal loss. Importantly, emerging technologies for spatial transcriptome analysis enable an unprecedented glimpse into the cellular composition and molecular mechanisms involved in lesion evolution. These promising technologies will help identify the identification of molecular hubs governing tissue damage and regeneration. SUMMARY: Recent neuropathological studies helped to identify tissue correlates of disability and disease progression. Substantial progress in molecular brain tissue analysis revealed the complexity of MS-related tissue features. Close collaboration between tissue-based, molecular, bioinformatic, pharmacologic, imaging and clinical experts is needed to continue to advance the field, particularly for the benefit of people with progressive MS.

Indexed as

BrainMultiple SclerosisNeuropathologyDisease ProgressionHumanscortical demyelinationmicrogliamultiple sclerosisneuropathologyremyelination

Identifiers

PMID40178490
PMCPMC12052066

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.