Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40179083›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Prognostic implications of MUC1 and XBP1 concordant expression in multiple myeloma: A retrospective study.

Sheerien Kareem Rajput, Khurram Minhas, Iqbal Azam, Sadia Habib, Usman Shaikh, El-Nasir Lalani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sheerien Kareem RajputCentre for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-4542
Khurram MinhasDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Iqbal AzamDepartment of Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sadia HabibCentre for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Usman ShaikhDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
El-Nasir LalaniCentre for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9733-459X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a disease of malignant plasma cells (PC) with poor survival. Disease progression and treatment relapse are attributed to MM cancer stem cells (CSCs) and signaling molecules such as MUC1 and XBP1. The study aimed to determine the prognostic value of expression of CSC-associated biomarkers, MUC1 and XBP1 in MM, which has not been explored previously. In this study, we determined the immunohistochemical expression of CSC markers (ALDH1, CD117, and CD34), MUC1, and XBP1 in 128 MM formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded bone marrow archival blocks. The expression of biomarkers was assessed for association with clinicopathological variables and patient survival. Descriptive analysis, survival plots and crude association between outcome and independent variables were assessed using Kaplan Meier and Log rank test. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed using simple and multiple Cox regression models. The results are reported as crude and adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Expression of ALDH1 and CD117 was found in 51% and 48% of the tumors, respectively. ALDH1 expression was associated with 1.83 years of reduced survival for patients with CD56-negative tumors. MUC1 expression was observed in 62%, whereas XBP1 was expressed in 48% of tumors. Combinatorial group analysis of XBP1 and MUC1 stratified patients into two prognostic groups. Cases with tumors negative for expression of MUC1 and XBP1 (XBP1-/ MUC1-) were categorized as a good prognostic group with increased survival of 3.42 years compared to cases with tumors expressing both (Worst prognosis, XBP1 + /MUC1+). Concordant expression of MUC1 and XBP1 in MM defines a subset of patients with adverse outcomes. The adjusted hazard ratio showed a four-fold increased risk of mortality associated with the concordant expression of MUC1 and XBP1 in patients > 65 years of age.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsMucin-1Multiple MyelomaTranscription FactorsX-Box Binding Protein 1AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplastic Stem CellsBiomarkers, TumorDNA-Binding ProteinsMUC1 protein, humanMucin-1Regulatory Factor X Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsX-Box Binding Protein 1XBP1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID40179083
PMCPMC11967961

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.