Trial reportPloS one2025
Effect of opioid-free anesthesia combined with pectoral nerve block on the quality of recovery in patients after mastectomy: A randomized, controlled trial.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Role of Opioid-Free Anesthesia Versus Opioid-Based Anesthesia in Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pharmacologic management of postoperative sleep disturbance in breast cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the impact of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) combined with regional blocks on the quality of recovery (QoR) in patients who underwent mastectomy.
methodsThis randomized controlled trial involved 132 mastectomy patients who were randomized to receive either OFA combined with PECS block or opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) combined with PECS block. The QoR was assessed using the QoR-15 global score at 24 h post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative sufentanil consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores at 1, 4, and 24 h, incidence of postoperative adverse events, extubation, incidence of severe bradycardia and intraoperative mean artrial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at after entering the operating room (T0, baseline value), after intubation (T1), after skin incision (T2), and after extubation (T3).
resultsThe QoR-15 global score at 24 h was not significantly different between groups (MD = -0.4, 95% CI [-3.8 to 4.7], P = 0.67). Postoperative sufentanil consumptions (P = 0.075), the incidence of PONV (P = 0.12), NRS scores at 1 h (P = 0.36), 4 h (P = 0.53), and 24 h (P = 0.02) were not significantly different. Incidence of adverse events (OR = 0, 95% CI [0 to 0.44], P = 0.0063) were lower in Group OFA than that in Group OBA. Extubation time was significantly longer in Group OFA than in Group OBA (MD = 15, 95%CI [10-18], P < 0.001). MAPs at T1 and T2 were significantly higher in Group OFA than in Group OBA (P < 0.0125), while MAP and HR at T3 were significantly lower in Group OFA than in Group OBA(P < 0.0125). Incidence of severe bradycardia were not significantly different (P = 0.67).
conclusionIn conclusion, while OFA contributes to a reduction in adverse events, its integration with PECS blocks does not improve QoR or postoperative analgesia at 24 h post-mastectomy. Moreover, OFA was associated with a prolonged extubation time.
trial registrationchictr.org; registration number: ChiCTR2100043575.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.