Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40179979›Full record

ArticleJournal of fish biology2025

Group swimming significantly decreases time to passage success for a galaxiid species.

Rachel M B Crawford, Eleanor M Gee, Brendan J Hicks, Paul A Franklin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of fish biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rachel M B CrawfordSchool of Science, Environmental Research Institute, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2357-2901
Eleanor M GeeNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Brendan J HicksSchool of Science, Environmental Research Institute, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Paul A FranklinNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Funding

Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment CO1X625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted laboratory experiments to explore the potential benefits of group behaviour on passage performance for a small-bodied migratory species, inanga Galaxias maculatus. An artificial velocity barrier was created to compare the fish passage success of groups of fish to solitary individuals. Passage success was measured using several metrics, including binomial success models and time-to-event analysis. Active metabolic rates were also measured as indices of energetic expenditure. Our findings revealed that fish swimming in groups have faster entry and passage rates compared to solitary individuals, but there was no difference in the proportion of fish successfully passing. Successful fish in groups displayed lower metabolic rates, suggesting the potential benefit of reduced energy expenditure for groups of fish. While group swimming did not enhance overall passage success, it significantly reduced the time required for successful passage compared to solitary swimming individuals. These findings underscore the importance of designing fish passes that accommodate gregarious species, ensuring improved success for fish populations overall. By considering the advantages of group behaviour on passage performance, fish passage structures can be tailored to better facilitate the movement of diverse fish species through aquatic environments.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationOsmeriformesSocial BehaviorSwimmingAnimalsEnergy MetabolismTime Factorsactive metabolic ratesfish passagefish schoolinggroup behaviour

Identifiers

PMID40179979
PMCPMC12360137

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.