Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40180637›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2025

An interpretable radiomics-based machine learning model for predicting reverse left ventricular remodeling in STEMI patients using late gadolinium enhancement of myocardial scar.

Xiuzheng Yue, Jianing Cui, Sicong Huang, Wenjia Liu, Jing Qi, Kunlun He, Tao Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiuzheng Yue *Medical Big Data Research Center, Medical Innovation Research Division of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jianing Cui *Department of Radiology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Sicong HuangPhilips Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Wenjia LiuDepartment of Radiology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jing QiMedical Big Data Research Center, Medical Innovation Research Division of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kunlun HeMedical Big Data Research Center, Medical Innovation Research Division of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. kunlunhe@plagh.org.
Tao LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. litaofeivip@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6689-2951

Funding

New Technology and Business of Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital No.20230116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the added value of the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-scar radiomics features in predicting reverse left ventricular remodeling (r-LVR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients using machine learning (ML). MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective study included 105 STEMI patients who underwent CMR within 7 days and 5 months post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on 1.5-T or 3.0-T MRI scanners (January 2014-2023). Radiomics features from LGE scar images and routine CMR markers were analyzed using a LightGBM model enhanced by Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for interpretability. Patients were divided into training (80) and test (25) sets. Three predictive models were developed: traditional CMR, LGE-scar radiomics, and a combined model integrating both. Model performance was assessed using ROC curves and AUC analysis.

resultsIn the training set, the traditional CMR model achieved an AUC of 0.745 (95% CI: 0.62-0.86), the LGE-scar radiomics model had an AUC of 0.712 (95% CI: 0.58-0.83), and the combined model showed the highest AUC of 0.754 (95% CI: 0.63-0.86). In the test set, the traditional CMR model's AUC decreased to 0.656 (95% CI: 0.42-0.88), while the LGE-scar radiomics model improved to 0.818 (95% CI: 0.59-1.00). The combined model achieved the highest AUC of 0.890 (95% CI: 0.75-1.00). SHAP analysis highlighted significant predictors such as infarct percentage of LV mass and wavelet-transformed texture features.

conclusionIntegrating LGE scar radiomics features with traditional CMR parameters in a LightGBM model enhances predictive accuracy for r-LVR in STEMI patients, potentially improving patient stratification and treatment personalization. KEY POINTS: Question Predicting r-LVR in STEMI patients remains challenging due to limitations in current imaging approaches. Findings Integrating LGE-scar radiomics and cardiac magnetic resonance markers in the LightGBM model significantly improves prediction accuracy for r-LVR. Clinical relevance This interpretable ML model enhances r-LVR prediction, supporting patient stratification and optimizing treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Indexed as

CicatrixHeartMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionVentricular RemodelingContrast MediaFemaleGadoliniumHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardiumRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaGadoliniumMachine learningMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomicsST-elevation myocardial infarctionVentricular remodeling

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.