ArticleEuropean radiology2025
An interpretable radiomics-based machine learning model for predicting reverse left ventricular remodeling in STEMI patients using late gadolinium enhancement of myocardial scar.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Altered Neural Activity in Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder With Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: A Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Meta-Analysis.Neural plasticity · 2025Pooled it
- Generation of contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI from contrast-free scans: a multi-center, multi-manufacturer study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence as a Diagnostic Tool in Preoperative Surgical Planning for Early Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- IVIM-DWI-Based Radiomics for Lesion Phenotyping and Clinical Status Prediction in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Visual and Predictive Assessment of Pneumothorax Recurrence in Adolescents Using Machine Learning on Chest CT.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Labral Repair or Reconstruction.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Added Value of SPECT/CT in Radio-Guided Occult Localization (ROLL) of Non-Palpable Pulmonary Nodules Treated with Uniportal Video-Assisted Thoracoscopy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- CT-Based Radiomics Enhance Respiratory Function Analysis for Lung SBRT.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Preliminary Evaluation of Radiomics in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Prognostic Prediction of Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2025Article
- Is Personalized Mechanical Thrombectomy Based on Clot Characteristics Feasible? A Radiomics Model Using NCECT to Predict FPE in AIS Patients Undergoing Thromboaspiration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Personalized prediction model for scar response after radionuclide therapy: development and validation in a Chinese cohort.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the added value of the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE)-scar radiomics features in predicting reverse left ventricular remodeling (r-LVR) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients using machine learning (ML). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 105 STEMI patients who underwent CMR within 7 days and 5 months post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on 1.5-T or 3.0-T MRI scanners (January 2014-2023). Radiomics features from LGE scar images and routine CMR markers were analyzed using a LightGBM model enhanced by Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for interpretability. Patients were divided into training (80) and test (25) sets. Three predictive models were developed: traditional CMR, LGE-scar radiomics, and a combined model integrating both. Model performance was assessed using ROC curves and AUC analysis.
resultsIn the training set, the traditional CMR model achieved an AUC of 0.745 (95% CI: 0.62-0.86), the LGE-scar radiomics model had an AUC of 0.712 (95% CI: 0.58-0.83), and the combined model showed the highest AUC of 0.754 (95% CI: 0.63-0.86). In the test set, the traditional CMR model's AUC decreased to 0.656 (95% CI: 0.42-0.88), while the LGE-scar radiomics model improved to 0.818 (95% CI: 0.59-1.00). The combined model achieved the highest AUC of 0.890 (95% CI: 0.75-1.00). SHAP analysis highlighted significant predictors such as infarct percentage of LV mass and wavelet-transformed texture features.
conclusionIntegrating LGE scar radiomics features with traditional CMR parameters in a LightGBM model enhances predictive accuracy for r-LVR in STEMI patients, potentially improving patient stratification and treatment personalization. KEY POINTS: Question Predicting r-LVR in STEMI patients remains challenging due to limitations in current imaging approaches. Findings Integrating LGE-scar radiomics and cardiac magnetic resonance markers in the LightGBM model significantly improves prediction accuracy for r-LVR. Clinical relevance This interpretable ML model enhances r-LVR prediction, supporting patient stratification and optimizing treatment strategies to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40180637What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.