ArticleScientific reports2025
Educational disparities in 20-year trajectories of psychological well-being in a national sample.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eudaimonia as Personal Growth: Decades of Research and Needed Future Directions.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- US State Policy Contexts and Mental Health Among Working-Age Adults.The Milbank quarterly · 2026Article
- Do all components of psychological well-being predict cognitive function?The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026Article
- Dynamic network models reveal personalized patterns of well-being in young adult daily lives.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-term trajectories of psychological well-being were investigated using data from a national longitudinal study known as MIDUS (Midlife in the U.S.) The central question was whether educational status and age were associated with gains, losses, or persistent disadvantage on widely studied dimensions of eudaimonic well-being such as personal growth, purpose in life, and self-acceptance. Findings from a sample of adults (N = 6908), aged 25-74 at baseline, showed primarily loss across the 20-year period (1995-2015). Those with a high school education or less showed persistently lower levels of six distinct aspects of well-being compared to those with more education across time. In addition, purpose in life declined for all age groups. Losses over time for autonomy, environmental mastery, and personal growth were steeper for the oldest age group (i.e., 61 years and older) compared to younger (i.e., 40 years and younger) and midlife (i.e., 41-60 years) adults, while losses for self-acceptance were steepest for young adults compared to the two older age groups. The role of structural inequalities in understanding variation in these well-being trajectories and their implications for future health are considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.