ArticleScientific reports2025
Maximum admittance method for cerebrovascular outlet boundary conditions and importance of stenosis severity as a dominant factor on hemodynamics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, we propose the maximum admittance method based on an analytical solution of two-element Windkessel model to generate pressure waveforms for imposing outlet boundary conditions in blood flow simulations in the absence of in vivo pressure data. The lumped parameters of the Windkessel model, which were not calibrated from the in vivo pressure, were determined to maximize peripheral admittance. By applying the pressure waveforms at outlet boundaries, hemodynamic characteristics of human cerebrovascular networks, including stenotic middle cerebral arteries (MCAs), were investigated through transient flow simulations. Two age-related flow waveforms, in addition to three different blood viscosities, were applied across each severity case (total 24 simulation cases). The age-related flow waveforms introduced normalized relative residence time disparities exceeding 30% in post-stenosis regions with over 50% severity. Additionally, stenosis exceeding 50% severity redirected more blood flow toward anterior cerebral artery, leading to MCA ischemia at 88% severity. The maximum pressure gradient on the stenotic walls and fractional pressure ratio exhibited changes below 9% and 3%, respectively, despite a 54.5% increase in viscosity. The stenosis severity was a dominant physiological factor, suggesting 50% severity as a critical transition point in cerebral hemodynamics. This threshold can help in quickly identifying risky locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.