ArticleSouthern African journal of HIV medicine2025
Diagnostic use of abdominal ultrasound in detecting extrapulmonary tuberculosis or lymphoma in an HIV-endemic region.
Article in Southern African journal of HIV medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsies: feasible and safe use of pathology services in a resource-limited, high TB/HIV prevalence setting.The ultrasound journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) is common among people living with HIV (PLWH). Abdominal ultrasound is an accessible investigation, frequently employed to support the diagnosis of EPTB, but may lead to misdiagnoses of diseases with overlapping clinical features, such as lymphoma. Objectives: To describe the abdominal ultrasound features and confirmed diagnoses of patients referred to a biopsy clinic with unexplained lymphadenopathy. Method: This was a retrospective descriptive study of patients attending the peripheral lymph node biopsy clinic at Groote Schuur Hospital between 2017 and 2020, who had abdominal ultrasound examinations while being investigated for unexplained lymphadenopathy. Ultrasound features were compared to the final diagnosis made on the lymph node biopsy. Results: Thirty-four patients were included, most of whom were PLWH (59%). Approximately one-third had a confirmed diagnosis of lymphoma (29%) and approximately one-third had a confirmed diagnosis of tuberculosis (32%). Splenic hypoechoic lesions were more common in patients with lymphoma (64%) than in patients with tuberculosis (46%) and malignancy (17%). Ascites was equally distributed between patients with tuberculosis (36%) and lymphoma (36%). The ultrasound report and confirmed diagnoses agreed in 40% of patients with tuberculosis. Additionally, 36% of patients with confirmed lymphoma were suspected to have tuberculosis based on the abdominal ultrasound. Conclusion: Abdominal ultrasound abnormalities such as splenic hypoechoic lesions, lymphadenopathy, and ascites/pleural effusion have a differential diagnosis including both tuberculosis and lymphoma, and should be investigated accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.