Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40182177›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2025

GREEN: A lightweight architecture using learnable wavelets and Riemannian geometry for biomarker exploration with EEG signals.

Joseph Paillard, Jörg F Hipp, Denis A Engemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph PaillardRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Neuroscience and Rare Diseases, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Jörg F HippRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Neuroscience and Rare Diseases, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Denis A EngemannRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Neuroscience and Rare Diseases, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spectral analysis using wavelets is widely used for identifying biomarkers in EEG signals. Recently, Riemannian geometry has provided an effective mathematical framework for predicting biomedical outcomes from multichannel electroencephalography (EEG) recordings while showing concord with neuroscientific domain knowledge. However, these methods rely on handcrafted rules and sequential optimization. In contrast, deep learning (DL) offers end-to-end trainable models achieving state-of-the-art performance on various prediction tasks but lacks interpretability and interoperability with established neuroscience concepts. We introduce Gabor Riemann EEGNet (GREEN), a lightweight neural network that integrates wavelet transforms and Riemannian geometry for processing raw EEG data. Benchmarking on six prediction tasks across four datasets with over 5,000 participants, GREEN outperformed non-deep state-of-the-art models and performed favorably against large DL models while using orders-of-magnitude fewer parameters. Computational experiments showed that GREEN facilitates learning sparse representations without compromising performance. By integrating domain knowledge, GREEN combines a desirable complexity-performance trade-off with interpretable representations.

Indexed as

BCIbiomarkersbrain-computer interfacedeep learningEEGelectroencephalographyRiemannian geometrywavelets

Identifiers

PMID40182177
PMCPMC11963017

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.